Effects of changes in the volume of automated external defibrillator audio guidance on audibility: a pilot usability study

Article information

J EMS Med. 2024;3(3):68-73

Publication date (electronic) : 2024 June 20

doi : https://doi.org/10.35616/jemsm.2024.00087

Koshi Nakagawa^,1, Etsuko Sone², Manabu Oki², Shumpei Omori³, Masaya Tanaka⁴, Ryu Kimura⁴, Hinata Kijima⁴, Hatsumi Yanagisawa⁴, Taku Harigaya⁴, Hideharu Tanaka^2,3,4

¹Department of Integrated Science and Engineering for Sustainable Societies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan

²Research Institute of Disaster Management and EMS, Kokushikan University, Tokyo, Japan

³Department of Sport and Medical Science, Kokushikan University, Tokyo, Japan

⁴Graduate School of Emergency Medical System, Kokushikan University, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to: Koshi Nakagawa Department of Integrated Science and Engineering for Sustainable Societies, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, 1-13-27, Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan E-mail: knakagawa493@g.chuo-u.ac.jp

Received 2024 January 23; Revised 2024 April 11; Accepted 2024 April 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 130,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases occur annually in Japan, and although the survival rate is increasing each year, it remains low [1,2]. In order to improve post-OHCA outcomes, the chain of survival has been emphasized [3], especially cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillators (AEDs), which can be performed within a short period after the onset of OHCA [4]. While the rates of bystander CPR and public access defibrillation (PAD) in Japan have been increasing annually [5,6], the PAD implementation rate in 2022 was only 4.2% [1]. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the PAD implementation rate, necessitating a nationwide effort to increase PAD implementation.

Some AEDs provide visual and audible operational guidance, which simplifies their use [7]. However, there have been instances where the shock was not delivered despite the announcement [8,9]. The effectiveness of AED operational guidance can be compromised by environmental factors at the scene of a cardiac arrest and the user's skill level. Public places, for example, tend to be noisier than residential areas, increasing the likelihood that the user may not hear the AED's audio instructions and may operate the device incorrectly. Despite these challenges, OHCA occurrences in public places are expected to have favorable outcomes [6,10-12]. Therefore, reliable and rapid defibrillation is crucial.

To address this problem, ClearVoice technology was developed (Stryker). This technology adjusts the frequency of voice guidance and modifies the volume incrementally to adapt to environmental noise during AED use, with the goal of improving the audibility of AED audio guidance in noisy settings, such as those encountered during medical support at sporting events—an area that has gained increasing importance in recent years [13,14]. However, there has been no research on whether altering the volume of the AED's audio guidance actually improves its audibility in real-world noisy environments. As AED installations continue to increase, this study could provide valuable insights into which AED functions are best suited for specific environments.

We aimed to assess whether automatically adjusting the volume of AED audio guidance to match the environmental noise level would facilitate easier auditory comprehension for AED users in noisy settings.

METHODS

Intervention

We utilized the CR2 (Fig. 1), which automatically activates the AED upon opening the lid. Operational instructions are provided on the back of the lid and on the defibrillation pad. The CR2 is capable of recognizing environmental sounds, and the frequency of the voice guidance can be adjusted. Additionally, the volume of the audio guidance can be incrementally increased to a maximum of 95 dB. Adjusting the sound volume takes time to assess the environmental noises and may require several seconds to a dozen seconds to reach the desired volume. The study commenced after obtaining oral and written informed consent from the participants. Initially, participants operated the AED in a noisy environment without the volume-change function (no-change). Subsequently, they completed a questionnaire (Supplementary Material). Then, they used the AED with the volume-change function (change) and completed the same questionnaire after the session. In this study, participants activated the AED, listened to the audio guidance, and prepared to apply the AED pad in a noisy setting. However, they did not actually apply the AED pad to a mannequin or perform defibrillation. Participants were not previously informed that the volume of the AED would be adjusted.

Fig. 1.

LIFEPAK CR2. Image provided by Stryker K.K.

RESULTS

Participant flow and recruitment

The flow chart of the study participants is shown in Fig. 2. All 12 participants provided consent for participation. No participants met the exclusion criteria.

Fig. 2.

Participant flow diagram and study sequence.

Participants’ characteristics

Participants’ characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean age of the participants was 24.1 years. The participants included three ELSTs and nine ELST students, all of whom had received CPR training within the past 2 years.

Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics (n=12)

Outcomes

The results of this analysis are shown in Table 2. For subjective audibility in the primary outcome, the mean±SD score was 4.83±2.12 in the change group and 2.50±1.83 in the no-change group; higher subjective audibility was observed in the change group (difference, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.64). For subjective usability, the mean±SD score was 4.92±1.51 in the change group and 5.00±1.35 in the no-change group, indicating nearly identical subjective usability for both functions (difference, –0.08; 95% CI, –0.77 to 0.61). In terms of recognizing audio guidance, 11 participants (91.2%) in the change group and eight participants (66.7%) in the no-change group were able to do so, demonstrating that a significant number of participants could recognize audio guidance (κ=0.36; 95% CI, –0.16 to 0.88).

Table 2.

The results of the usability measurements

DISCUSSION

We assessed whether automatically adjusting the volume of the AED's audio guidance based on the environmental noise level improved audibility for users in noisy settings. The results indicated that this feature increased subjective audibility, with 91.2% of AED users reporting clear recognition of the audio guidance.

This study suggests that adjusting the volume of the operational audio guidance on an AED can be beneficial when the device is used in noisy environments. Typically, AEDs are equipped with visual aids, such as illustrations or LCD screens. However, given the urgency when using an AED, it can be challenging to focus on visual instructions. In these situations, audio guidance proves to be effective, facilitating the use of an AED without reliance on visual cues. Nevertheless, acute psychological stress, often experienced during AED use, can impair cognitive function. This decline, coupled with environmental noise, may make it even harder to hear audio instructions [16]. Moreover, with the increasing adoption of fully automated defibrillators in recent years [17,18], it has become increasingly important to provide clear and audible audio guidance to AED users to help prevent accidents, such as electrocution.

Although this study was limited to measurements at a sports event, its findings might support the use of AEDs in a variety of public places, including large sporting events such as the Olympic Games [19], as well as mid-sized community sporting events and general public gatherings. Since the noise level at crowded events can vary widely depending on the size and number of spectators, it is especially important for the AED audio guidance to be clearly audible. Psychological effects, such as anxiety, and technical inexperience can prevent laypersons from initiating BLS and AED use [20], and this stress can be particularly high in a noisy or crowded environment. However, confidence in the AED is expected to reduce anxiety. Thus, the audibility of the AED audio guidance is a very important feature. In recent years, OHCA in public places has been reported to be associated with favorable outcomes [6,10-12]. It is hoped that the widespread implementation of AEDs, featuring both easy-to-hear audio guidance and highly visible visual guidance, will enable everyone to use an AED safely and effectively, even during emergencies.

This study has several limitations. First, as this was a pilot study, it did not conclusively demonstrate the effectiveness of the function for adjusting the audio guidance volume. Further interventional studies based on the findings of this study are warranted. Second, the sound pressure level in the environment where this study was conducted was not constant and varied over time. Therefore, the noise level may have decreased at certain times, making the audio guidance easier to hear. Third, all participants in this study had completed a CPR course within the past 2 years. Thus, the results may not be representative of laypersons who have not undergone such training. It is crucial to include laypersons who are not trained in BLS in future studies. Fourth, the function used in this study to adjust the volume detects environmental sounds and changes the volume incrementally; thus, it may take time to reach a volume level that is sufficiently loud to understand the AED guidance. As a result, we cannot assert that this will lead to rapid defibrillation. Fifth, since all participants initially used AEDs without the volume change and then with the volume change, and because this study was not randomized, there may have been residual order effects.

We assessed whether adjusting an AED’s audio guidance volume based on ambient noise levels facilitated easier auditory reception for users in noisy settings. The study demonstrated that this feature improved subjective audibility, with 91.2% of participants able to discern the AED's audio instructions. Moving forward, it will be essential to develop and distribute AEDs that are universally easy to operate in various environments.

Supplementary Material

Article information Continued